Anniversary Sermon

I delivered the following sermon at the General Assembly Anniversary Service in April 2003, held in St Mark's Unitarian Church, Edinburgh. This sermon is also on the website of the British Unitarians .

A Universalist Sense of Ministry


A key unifying factor in our variously named member congregations is that we do not require any formal statement of belief for ministry or membership. We take pride in being a creedless religious community, but we do this because we value individual religious expression and commitment too highly to allow coercion by others. Our aversion to creeds, however, should not be allowed to become an aversion to content. Each of us should have a developing religious perspective whose content we can share with others. Our promotion of the richness of diversity will appear very shallow to outsiders if all we offer is a content-free process. A content-free process is abstract to the point of coldness and while experts can get into a heated argument about how cold the dark side of Pluto is, that heat doesn't make Pluto any warmer.

I have identified with the Universalist side of our liberal religious community ever since I joined 42 years ago in the USA, having had previous contact with the Universalist Church in the village of Oak Park where I was born. Classical Universalism held that the Love of God leads ultimately to the salvation of every individual soul. This was a Bible-based faith that first appeared in Britain and America in "organised" congregations towards the end of the 18th century, slightly earlier than when various radical dissenting congregations were coalescing around the "Unitarian" label. In Britain, the leaders of the Universalist cause joined the Unitarian cause in that time, providing heart and vigour.

My personal creed, essentially Universalism of the old school with modern vocabulary and philosophical foundations, is as follows: God is Love and we are creatures of Love. We are created, nurtured, and fulfilled by creative love working within us, through us, and amongst us creating Truth and Beauty, Healing and Wholeness. Value arises from the activity of God's creative, dynamic Spirit, and value- oriented communities are central to developing individual potential and enabling just communities. Religion is more a matter of spiritual awareness and practical commitment than it is of rational theology.

There is a more recent use of "universalist" to mean universal heritage, unbounded by any particular faith vocabulary. At first sight these two uses of the word seem disjointed, but a closer look reveals that (in the old vocabulary I am no longer completely comfortable with) a loving God intending every soul to be saved provides everyone with insights sufficient for their progressive development. That is, God's care is not limited to those who accept a particular revelation centred on the life and death of Jesus. God's care has resulted in sufficient religious revelation/ guidance that those who have never heard of Jesus will also be saved with minimum need for corrective punishment. The complexity and depth of Reality have to be seen from various perspectives for a fuller understanding. We, from our limited cultural background, have much to learn by serious encounter with other cultures. I believe that it is NOT true that all religions are saying the same thing and it is NOT true that all insights are equally valid. But all religions are struggling with the same mysterious, complex reality and have learnt something unique to share with others. This, at least, is part of the perspective of the Universalist.

Contexts for tonight's service include the war in Iraq; the GA Theme of Removing Barriers; our GA financial difficulties with our concurrent discussion on organisational structure and goals; and even the survey of attitudes towards ministerial roles initiated by Resolution at the 2002 Meetings. I will not be addressing any of these contexts directly, although some of my perspectives may be apposite to some of these issues.

While the first reading was chosen with one eye on our new GA theme, it also reflects my personal approach to practical ministry. The second reading on the glory of God's work in evolution reminds us of the majesty of the process that helped us to get where we are; it also points to a broader degree of sympathetic reflection on Darwinian ideas than we usually credit. The Rev Henry Drummond was a professor of natural science to a religious community that we would normally judge to be illiberal, yet his attempt to harmonise his theological and scientific understandings is a marvellous example of liberalism. We typically distinguish between reasoning and feeling, head and heart. This can be helpful, but it can also take us too far from the real world in which our emotional and rational faculties are more or less integrated into our personalities. One word I have found useful is "sense", used for an awareness with both cognitive and emotional dimensions. My use of "sense" in the sermon title, therefore, points to both an attempt at dispassionate analysis and an expression of passionate commitment.

I'd like you all to do something for me for a few seconds. Look around at the people nearest you - to the left, to the right, in front, and behind. It wouldn't hurt to smile and acknowledge their existence. ......... What did you see? Someone you know well enough to know that they regularly and currently suffer from piles? Or their spouse is babysitting an autistic child so they can be here? Or their cousin/ daughter/ grandson has just been diagnosed as having cancer? Or that they are cheating on their partner and dreading exposure? (This does happen in Unitarian circles.) Or that they are facing the economics of redundancy? Perhaps you looked into the eyes of a stranger. Perhaps you smiled at someone who has a close family member in the armed forces serving in Iraq. Or someone with a physical or emotional impairment that makes "routine" tasks a daily struggle.

Virtually everyone in this building will have private sufferings -- physical, emotional, psychological, or spiritual, that are not readily visible to others. We usually appear OK even when we are screaming inside for comfort or release. Universalist theology starts with a God of Love, but it very quickly moves to an awareness of the reality and universality of suffering and builds its sense of ministry to the world on these twin foundations.

Universalist ministry is the ministry of the whole church to the whole world. Of course there are limitations, set by personality, resources, time, skills, but the goal is to remove barriers and build bridges to overcome what limitations we can. The same universalising process that led the Jews to shift their understanding of God from a tribal war champion to the Creator of the Universe now needs to be applied to our modern understandings of science and nature, whether we are talking cosmology or DNA. The dynamic, creative process shaping our richly diverse universe through billions of years has not chosen a small subsection of Earth's inhabitants for special favour and this is part of the universalist message, whether the context is sociological (confronting the various partialisms and phobias that permeate society) or theological (confronting the claims of special and particular salvation).

The right kind of leadership can enable our congregations to exercise ministry more effectively by providing example, encouragement, sensitive support, special skills and knowledge and training. This can be crucial in taking the ministry of the whole church to greater qualitative depths, where "ministry" means using our lives and resources to assist the creative process and "minister", means someone (including a Lay Pastor or Lay Leader) who is committing their working life (or a substantial part of it) to the special role of helping the congregation undertake its ministry. But members need to have the self-understanding that places them as key players on a team. Whether we are talking about prayer, pastoral care, social justice work in the community, publicity, interfaith contacts, or public worship, if "the minister" is doing it all, neither minister nor members are enabling the church to serve the world properly.

Our hopes, our commitments, our attitudes, and particularly our actions are the arena of our ministry. It's not good enough to say that God loves us, if this has no effect on how we relate to other people. Nor is it good enough to say that God loves the world if this has no effect on how we relate to our environment. Responsible and localised consumption; sustainable development; fair trade; tough curbs on pollution: too many issues for any one of us to focus on, but our faith that "God loves the world", means we will include some such issues in the patterning of our ministry.

Worship is frequently seen as the prerogative of "the minister". They have special training and hopefully special skills in helping congregations to worship but good worship is neither an academic exercise nor a matter of the group following the leader blindly; nor is it a matter of sitting passively and letting the leader "get on with it". Celebrating the spirit of life and love and beauty, focusing on the source of our values, increasing our devotion to a life of value, giving thanks for the bounty of life - all these require preparation and active focus in order to be effective. This ministry of worship is the responsibility of every member.

Carter Heyward has a passage in Cries of the Spirit about practical love where she says: "Loving involves commitment. We are not automatic lovers of self, others, world, or God. Love does not just happen. We are not love machines, puppets on the strings of a deity called "love". Love is a choice -- not simply, or necessarily, a rational choice, but rather a willingness to be present to others without pretence or guile. Love is a conversion to humanity -- a willingness to participate with others in the healing of a broken world and broken lives. Love is the choice to experience life as a member of the human family, a partner in the dance of life, rather than as an alien in the world or as a deity above the world, aloof and apart from human flesh."

We can start with a gloriously general principle like "God is Love". We can then move from the general to the particular: God loves us. We can ponder how, in a particular situation, we can respond to God's love. And when we respond in love and by being where that love is needed, we sense that God's love is present in our lives. We sense that our lives are bridges in the world between sin and salvation, between suffering and healing, between the general and the particular. As Kahlil Gibran put it, rather than seeing God in our hearts we see ourselves in the heart of God, at the centre of this awesome creative process at work in the world.

Personal commitment to a life shaped and guided by religious sensibilities is NOT a duty. It occurs as we reflect and respond to what we believe is valuable in and for our lives. Organising our personal resources to reflect what is valuable to us is an expression of commitment, not some imposed duty.

I now turn to a central practical implication of living out this view -- or not, as the case may be.

I believe that we desperately need a culture shift in our churches. In spite of possible political misunderstandings, we would do well to refer to ourselves as liberal religious communities rather than free religious communities. We say that revelation is not sealed but we often act as if our purses were. Forget the financial problems of the GA for a moment and look at where most of our congregations are - our congregations and our buildings that we say we love so much. How many of our ministers serve congregations where the live income funds a proper stipend for the minister? Simplifying somewhat, a congregation of 100 requires an average annual contribution of 1% gross income from each member to provide the minister with an income equal to the average of the congregation; a congregation of 40 needs an average contribution of 2.5%, and a congregation of 20 needs 5%. And this is just for the minister's stipend, not the cost of the whole ministry of the church.

If we see ministry as hiring someone to do ministry for us because we have some spiritual duty towards the world, this will be very different from seeing the called minister (or lay pastor or lay leader) as joining our religious community tohelp us to do our ministering. One reflection of this difference will be in our valuing of our support of our ministry.

For most of my adult life I have given a percentage of my gross income to charity in planned, regular giving -- the larger part of this going to various Unitarian causes. When I had small children and related responsibilities this percentage dropped to 1%, but is currently back above 5%. The value that each of you places on your local congregation and the situational stretching or squeezing that affects the actual amount you contribute is for each individual to judge, but I firmly believe that our congregations will never thrive until we support our own ministry. In words mostly of one syllable, one reason we are such poor givers is that too many of us see the ministry of our church as the job of someone we call a minister rather than as OUR, personal, ministry.

Fear of losing our congregations is strong, but the force of a positive commitment to share what we consider valuable is even stronger. Universalists proclaimed an end to fear as a primary motivation. We respond to God's love rather than God's wrath.

I close by illustrating what I mean by sharing the Parable of the Compassionate Jug by Idries Shah, a Sufi mystic who writes for "westerners".

In a hot, dusty, and dark hovel lies a man in agony, made worse by his inability to reach water to quench his thirst. A jug on a shelf on the other side of the room sees his plight and, moved by intense compassion, manages to shift itself to within arm's reach of the suffering man. In his thrashing about, the man discovers the jug and raises it to his lips, only to find that it is empty of water. In his frustration and anger he throws it against the wall and it breaks into pieces.

The progress of humanity depends on the productive functioning of value-oriented communities. As Erich Fromm stated in The Art of Loving, "Love is productive"! Our liberal religious approach has a unique gift to share, and we should be able and willing to share it, but to do this effectively, we each have to search our hearts for the lure, the sense of importance and direction that represents our patterning of our lives in response to a God of Love. This patterning includes action and resource priorities. If our churches do not adequately minister, they will be swept aside by some developing form of community valuing (perhaps even by theatre musicals as mentioned earlier in these Meetings) - and will deserve to be swept aside as shards of empty jugs. The answer is not to shift responsibility for our ministry even further onto a dedicated few. The answer is not to expect some other level of organisation to do our ministry for us. The answer is not to crouch in fear of being swept away, rather to commit our individual selves to shared ministry and commit our resources in line with our truly-felt value of our congregations, which we claim to love. Think on it: We are aware of being part of a dynamic creative force whose beauty and complexity stretch from the majesty of the cosmos to the quantum workings of particles we can only see at third hand. And in our fear and partial understandings we pull back from the very commitment that would make us effective ministers to our suffering world and its inhabitants.

In a few moments we will thank ministers and a lay pastor who are retiring and welcome those starting their ministry with us. Our retiring ministers and lay pastor have together given us 139 years of service, in most cases decades of their lives, leading the ministry of our churches. These men and women have given themselves to help us exercise our ministry for our fellow men and women; for the care of our social values of justice and community; for the care of our congregations that nurture and promote those values; and for the love of our world and its protection from exploitation, pollution, and destruction. We have indeed been blessed by their commitment.

We have new ministers, lay pastors and lay leaders coming through training. Three of them are being welcomed tonight. May we be blessed in future years by their commitment and may they find collaborative and supportive communities in our churches.

Amen.

05 March 2010

Valentine's Day 2010 at Glasgow Unitarian Church

The Readings comprised some poems written and read by Corinna Tyagi and excerpts from Khalil Gibran’s The Prophet relating to our better selves.

SERMON “Love and Suffering”

Today is Valentine's Day. It is also, this year, New Year's Day in the Chinese Calendar: Welcome to the Year of the Tiger.

Valentine's Day and the sending of messages of love is clearly a good example of commercialisation of a Saints Day. When I was a child growing up in the USA it was always secret and anonymous messages that were sent. Sending messages of professed love goes back perhaps 200 years when the refurbishment of a minor Christian saint wound up becoming the focus of a world-wide business plan. Starting with handwritten notes, it moved to the purchase of gaudy and sentimental expressions of romantic love. It is now, perhaps inevitably, moving on to the exchange of gifts and tests of earnestness. And it has moved well beyond its original Christian roots: When Barbara and I happened to be in India on Valentine's Day 8 years ago (on our Honeymoon) we went to a special Valentine's Day meal, at McDonald's in Delhi, with candle-light and soft music. Barbara was even able to buy a Valentine's Day card at a local Market.

I am not a Valentine Grinch: Romantic love has its legitimate place in the broad spectrum of emotions and actions connected with love, but it should have a valued minority place. The central focus of true love needs to be based in Reality, not idealised images, and the Reality of this world includes Suffering. Interestingly, the stories of Saints Valentine (and there were at least two, possibly three) incorporated the reality of suffering into the stories. So it's not the basic myths that have ignored the reality of suffering, but the way these myths have been commercialised. Essentially, tragedy doesn't sell, glamour and sparkle do, unless you can tap into underlying feelings of guilt, which some products do.

Having recently spent almost 5 years in Wales and being married to a Welsh woman, I came across the story of the Welsh St Valentine, a woman known as Santas Dwynwen. She's a minor Welsh heroine, currently in process of a face-lift. There are many reasons why you probably haven't heard much about her in Scotland, the chief one being that her Saint's Day is 25 January, when we are busy celebrating our Great National Hero, Rabbie Burns.

But before I tell you Santas Dwynwen’s story, some thoughts about heroes and heroines. Religious and secular communities need heroes and heroines. As a religious community we exist to promote lives committed to spiritual and ethical values. It is often useful to abstract a value from its context for examination, but this examination is faulty if it does not re-connect with its implementation in ordinary experience. One way religious communities do this is to make heroes/ saints/ avatars/ messiahs out of folk whose lives exemplify some important part of being more fully human. Sometimes this process is firmly grounded in fact (more likely some thin slice of it), often times it is based more on tradition, story and development of myth with little historical foundation. And there is a conundrum: The more single-issue you make your heroine or saint in order to illustrate an important teaching, the more they are de-humanised and removed from ordinary human experience. Getting the balance right can take generations of development.

To digress for a moment on one example of lost balance. We've had news in the past couple days of an evangelical Bible-believing group who are trying to re-establish female submissiveness in relations, not on the basis that human nature somehow would be improved (although they say that would be the result) but on the basis that it is Biblically mandated. Tradition divorced from the real exploitation of women around the world. These Biblical literalists want to reverse the social progress made in bringing women's voices into the decision process of society. You won't get that message in a Unitarian Church.

There are those who delight in showing that saints have feet of clay, but this is often to miss the point. Saints and heroines are not intended to be fully rounded perfect beings. So Martin Luther King was a womaniser and Mahatma Gandhi had kinky ideas about exposing himself to temptation in order to conquer it. But they both were important leaders who brought a deeper understanding of love and commitment to the struggles to free their peoples.

Having annual festivals or rituals connected with these saints is one way of periodically reminding ourselves of the values they have come to represent.

Reaching into myths and legends has sometimes been a very creative process, indeed. In the USA the establishment of Thanksgiving Day as a National holiday about the time of their Civil War used aspects of history very selectively, skipping over the mistreatment of the native Americans both by the colonial settlers and their subsequent generations. The westward expansion brought with it an almost instant rewriting of history portraying Indians as savages whose land didn't really belong to them so taking it wasn't really theft on a massive scale. Last December we once again came through one of the most developed and abused cultural celebrations surrounding the birth of the Prince of Peace. The myths and stories surrounding Jesus's birth and subsequent development of Christmas celebrations around the world quite intentionally incorporated unrelated local celebrations in an effort to make the celebration more inclusive. But the commercialisation of Christmas as more folk got disposable income and more other folk thought of ways to part them from their hard-earned cash hasn't really brought many to a closer appreciation of the values that Jesus sacrificed himself for. Iolo Morganwg, the Unitarian who devised / created the rituals connected with Bardic events at the annual National Eisteddfod in Wales, quite shamelessly distorted historical reality to serve his needs. And of course, here in Scotland some 90-95% of the history of wearing tartan was an instant expansion of myth around the visit of the germanic British King to Edinburgh orchestrated by Sir Walter Scot.

Secular holidays, too, have been variously established, intending to remind us of certain important values: World Aids Day; United Nations Day; Human Rights Day; Mothers' Day; -- now this last on the list is interesting. Established in the US as a Mothers' Day of Protest Against War it is now the biggest American holiday after Thanksgiving and the protest element has completely disappeared. And, like many things American, it has jumped the Atlantic and arrived on our shores and even now is assimilating our own nid-Lent Mothering Sunday.

So, to Santas Dwynwen: As slowly increasing numbers of Welsh are discovering, they have their own Valentine: Santes Dwynwen. In the interest of promoting cross-Celtic understanding, I'm going to tell you a bit about this Welsh holiday now being promoted by the Welsh Assemby as the Welsh Valentine's Day. Much of the following comes from the Web:

St Dwynwen is the patron saint of Welsh lovers and lived during the 5th century. She was said to be one of 24 children fathered by the then King of Wales, Brychan Brycheiniog of Brechon (Brecon). She was renowned to be both very religious and pure and was also said to be enchantingly beautiful. As the legend goes, one evening Dwynwen's father held a feast where everyone attended in the finest attire to eat and dance the night away. At the feast, Dwynwen's beauty captivated the attention of a young prince by the name of Maelon Gwynedd. He fell in love with her immediately and soon made clear to Dwynwen of his desire to marry her.

There are several versions of the story: 1. Dwynwen returned her love but couldn't marry Maelon as her religious beliefs had encouraged her to become a nun. 2. Brychan refused consent due to his dislike of Maelon. 3. Brychan refused consent due to arranging for Dwynwen to wed another suitor.

Consequently, there are several outcomes following the above: 1. Following her father's refusal, Dwynwen is asked by Maelon to run away with him to his court. Dwynwen rejects this, which angers Maelon who leaves never to return again. 2. Some versions claim that Maelon was so outraged by Dwynwen's chosen life of a nun (or by Brychan's refusals) that he raped and left her. 3. Some versions say that Maelon simply 'goes away' after realising that he and Dwynwen will never be together.

Dwynwen's sadness impels her to console herself in the woods nearby. There she prays to God to rid her of her feelings for Maelon. In the version where she is raped Dwynwen prays for help to 'forget' Maelon. Answering her prayers, an angel visits and gives her a potion to help rid her of her feelings or make her forget Maelon. Unfortunately, Maelon drinks the same potion and is turned into ice. Some claim that Maelon was turned to ice as a direct result of Dwynwen drinking the potion. This would probably be apt in the version where was raped. Dwynwen is horrified to learn of Maelon's misfortune and again prays to God, who answers by granting her three wishes: 1. The first was to have Maelon thawed and brought back to life. 2. The second was that God would look kindly on the hopes and dreams of true lovers whilst mending the broken hearts of the spurned. Most versions claim that Dwynwen requested this to be done through her, therefore making her a patron saint. 3. Her final request was that she was never to marry nor have the desire to do so in order to devote the remainder of her life to God. She then became a nun and settled on Llanddwyn Island, off the west coast of Anglesey, where a church or convent was founded. It is said that it was joined by many a broken hearted woman. Dwynwen's most known saying was "nothing wins hearts like cheerfulness".

Dwynwen died around 460 AD. The remains of a 16th century Tudor church in Llanddwyn are believed to be the site of the church founded by Dwynwen. The church and the nearby well have attracted pilgrimages over the centuries, particularly from young lovers. The water of the well was the home for a sacred fish (or eel) whose behaviour and movement predicted the future.

Recent years have seen an increase amongst Welsh people in the celebrating of St. Dwynwen's Day by exchanging cards and gifts such as lovespoons (another Welsh tradition). Special events such as parties and concerts are also held on the 25th of January, signifying a greater popularity of celebrating St. Dwynwen's Day amongst the Welsh.

So there you have it. The basic mythic story of a saint who embodies the determination, sacrifice, the loyalty associated with young love and a national tradition in the making. Romantic Love -- calling us to see and express the best in our loved one even if Reality is temporarily distorted/suspended.

But Love at its fullest deals with suffering compassionately. We all suffer personal loss and pain and we all suffer community injustice and inequality. To be compassionate is much more important than to be romantic, as most couples brought together by soft lights, music, and chocolate discover if they remain together.

As Dostoyevski put it: "Love will teach us all things: but we must learn how to win love; it is got with difficulty: it is a possession dearly bought with much labour and a long time; for one must love not sometimes only, for a passing moment, but always. There is no man who doth not sometimes love: even the wicked can do that. And let not men's sin dishearten thee: love a man even in his sin, for that love is a likeness of the divine love, and is the summit of love on earth. Love all God's creation, both the whole and every grain of sand. Love every leaf, every ray of light. Love the animals, love the plants, love each separate thing. If thou love each thing thou wilt perceive the mystery of God in all: and when once thou perceive this, thou wilt thenceforward grow every day to a fuller understanding of it: until thou come at last to love the whole world with a love that will then be all-embracing and universal." (end quote)

We need heroes and heroines; we need special celebrations -- the world is in danger of being seen as drab, dreary, and prosaic when it is really vibrant, varied, and creative. But we too often let our hearts get hardened to the beauty around us and wake-up calls to one aspect or another of our beautiful but suffering world are necessary.

But my closing basic point is: if peace is important to you, work for it all year round, don't just think about it on Christmas when you honour the Prince of Peace in ways he really wouldn't understand, or on Gandhi's birthday, or on Martin Luther King's birthday. If you really get upset at the sight of starving children, work for poverty relief and fair trade, don't just put a fiver in an emergency collection or the annual Christian Aid or Children in Need Appeal. If you really love and respect our natural world, do something about your daily energy consumption and our growing local problems with pollution, don't just go hug a tree in a ritual. And if you love someone special to you, sure, make the most of special occasions like birthdays or anniversaries or general cultural festivities like Mother's Day or Valentine's Day -- but also tell them that you love them regularly and frequently, not just on the special occasions. .... Amen

John Clifford

CLOSING HYMN: sung to “Where have all the flowers gone?”

1) When we have so many doubts of life’s meaning;
when we wonder who we are, which way to go;
when we feel so much turmoil, suffering and grief, we ask,
“Where will we find a way? How will we find a way?”

2) Loss of loved ones, death of friends, isolation;
grief and sorrow, broken lives, illness and pain;
in despair we doubt our faith, “Where is God?” we want to know,
When will it ever end? How will it ever end?”

3) Wars and torture, tyrannies, fear and prejudice;
selling bombs while children starve; polluted skies;
”Where is God’s love and concern in a world gone mad?”, we ask,
Whom do we choose to help? How do we try to help?”

4) How can we commit our lives, broken vessels?
Seek to make our sick world well, not whole ourselves?
Pray we now with heavy hearts, “Give us light that we may see
Why we can give our lives, how we can give our lives.”

5) Love of God, we seek to know your Reality.
Heal our wounds and make us whole! Help us to see
Love is not a ‘thing’ to hold! Love is living lovingly,
which we have yet to learn. “How will we ever learn?”

John Clifford, 2003

No comments: