Anniversary Sermon

I delivered the following sermon at the General Assembly Anniversary Service in April 2003, held in St Mark's Unitarian Church, Edinburgh. This sermon is also on the website of the British Unitarians .

A Universalist Sense of Ministry


A key unifying factor in our variously named member congregations is that we do not require any formal statement of belief for ministry or membership. We take pride in being a creedless religious community, but we do this because we value individual religious expression and commitment too highly to allow coercion by others. Our aversion to creeds, however, should not be allowed to become an aversion to content. Each of us should have a developing religious perspective whose content we can share with others. Our promotion of the richness of diversity will appear very shallow to outsiders if all we offer is a content-free process. A content-free process is abstract to the point of coldness and while experts can get into a heated argument about how cold the dark side of Pluto is, that heat doesn't make Pluto any warmer.

I have identified with the Universalist side of our liberal religious community ever since I joined 42 years ago in the USA, having had previous contact with the Universalist Church in the village of Oak Park where I was born. Classical Universalism held that the Love of God leads ultimately to the salvation of every individual soul. This was a Bible-based faith that first appeared in Britain and America in "organised" congregations towards the end of the 18th century, slightly earlier than when various radical dissenting congregations were coalescing around the "Unitarian" label. In Britain, the leaders of the Universalist cause joined the Unitarian cause in that time, providing heart and vigour.

My personal creed, essentially Universalism of the old school with modern vocabulary and philosophical foundations, is as follows: God is Love and we are creatures of Love. We are created, nurtured, and fulfilled by creative love working within us, through us, and amongst us creating Truth and Beauty, Healing and Wholeness. Value arises from the activity of God's creative, dynamic Spirit, and value- oriented communities are central to developing individual potential and enabling just communities. Religion is more a matter of spiritual awareness and practical commitment than it is of rational theology.

There is a more recent use of "universalist" to mean universal heritage, unbounded by any particular faith vocabulary. At first sight these two uses of the word seem disjointed, but a closer look reveals that (in the old vocabulary I am no longer completely comfortable with) a loving God intending every soul to be saved provides everyone with insights sufficient for their progressive development. That is, God's care is not limited to those who accept a particular revelation centred on the life and death of Jesus. God's care has resulted in sufficient religious revelation/ guidance that those who have never heard of Jesus will also be saved with minimum need for corrective punishment. The complexity and depth of Reality have to be seen from various perspectives for a fuller understanding. We, from our limited cultural background, have much to learn by serious encounter with other cultures. I believe that it is NOT true that all religions are saying the same thing and it is NOT true that all insights are equally valid. But all religions are struggling with the same mysterious, complex reality and have learnt something unique to share with others. This, at least, is part of the perspective of the Universalist.

Contexts for tonight's service include the war in Iraq; the GA Theme of Removing Barriers; our GA financial difficulties with our concurrent discussion on organisational structure and goals; and even the survey of attitudes towards ministerial roles initiated by Resolution at the 2002 Meetings. I will not be addressing any of these contexts directly, although some of my perspectives may be apposite to some of these issues.

While the first reading was chosen with one eye on our new GA theme, it also reflects my personal approach to practical ministry. The second reading on the glory of God's work in evolution reminds us of the majesty of the process that helped us to get where we are; it also points to a broader degree of sympathetic reflection on Darwinian ideas than we usually credit. The Rev Henry Drummond was a professor of natural science to a religious community that we would normally judge to be illiberal, yet his attempt to harmonise his theological and scientific understandings is a marvellous example of liberalism. We typically distinguish between reasoning and feeling, head and heart. This can be helpful, but it can also take us too far from the real world in which our emotional and rational faculties are more or less integrated into our personalities. One word I have found useful is "sense", used for an awareness with both cognitive and emotional dimensions. My use of "sense" in the sermon title, therefore, points to both an attempt at dispassionate analysis and an expression of passionate commitment.

I'd like you all to do something for me for a few seconds. Look around at the people nearest you - to the left, to the right, in front, and behind. It wouldn't hurt to smile and acknowledge their existence. ......... What did you see? Someone you know well enough to know that they regularly and currently suffer from piles? Or their spouse is babysitting an autistic child so they can be here? Or their cousin/ daughter/ grandson has just been diagnosed as having cancer? Or that they are cheating on their partner and dreading exposure? (This does happen in Unitarian circles.) Or that they are facing the economics of redundancy? Perhaps you looked into the eyes of a stranger. Perhaps you smiled at someone who has a close family member in the armed forces serving in Iraq. Or someone with a physical or emotional impairment that makes "routine" tasks a daily struggle.

Virtually everyone in this building will have private sufferings -- physical, emotional, psychological, or spiritual, that are not readily visible to others. We usually appear OK even when we are screaming inside for comfort or release. Universalist theology starts with a God of Love, but it very quickly moves to an awareness of the reality and universality of suffering and builds its sense of ministry to the world on these twin foundations.

Universalist ministry is the ministry of the whole church to the whole world. Of course there are limitations, set by personality, resources, time, skills, but the goal is to remove barriers and build bridges to overcome what limitations we can. The same universalising process that led the Jews to shift their understanding of God from a tribal war champion to the Creator of the Universe now needs to be applied to our modern understandings of science and nature, whether we are talking cosmology or DNA. The dynamic, creative process shaping our richly diverse universe through billions of years has not chosen a small subsection of Earth's inhabitants for special favour and this is part of the universalist message, whether the context is sociological (confronting the various partialisms and phobias that permeate society) or theological (confronting the claims of special and particular salvation).

The right kind of leadership can enable our congregations to exercise ministry more effectively by providing example, encouragement, sensitive support, special skills and knowledge and training. This can be crucial in taking the ministry of the whole church to greater qualitative depths, where "ministry" means using our lives and resources to assist the creative process and "minister", means someone (including a Lay Pastor or Lay Leader) who is committing their working life (or a substantial part of it) to the special role of helping the congregation undertake its ministry. But members need to have the self-understanding that places them as key players on a team. Whether we are talking about prayer, pastoral care, social justice work in the community, publicity, interfaith contacts, or public worship, if "the minister" is doing it all, neither minister nor members are enabling the church to serve the world properly.

Our hopes, our commitments, our attitudes, and particularly our actions are the arena of our ministry. It's not good enough to say that God loves us, if this has no effect on how we relate to other people. Nor is it good enough to say that God loves the world if this has no effect on how we relate to our environment. Responsible and localised consumption; sustainable development; fair trade; tough curbs on pollution: too many issues for any one of us to focus on, but our faith that "God loves the world", means we will include some such issues in the patterning of our ministry.

Worship is frequently seen as the prerogative of "the minister". They have special training and hopefully special skills in helping congregations to worship but good worship is neither an academic exercise nor a matter of the group following the leader blindly; nor is it a matter of sitting passively and letting the leader "get on with it". Celebrating the spirit of life and love and beauty, focusing on the source of our values, increasing our devotion to a life of value, giving thanks for the bounty of life - all these require preparation and active focus in order to be effective. This ministry of worship is the responsibility of every member.

Carter Heyward has a passage in Cries of the Spirit about practical love where she says: "Loving involves commitment. We are not automatic lovers of self, others, world, or God. Love does not just happen. We are not love machines, puppets on the strings of a deity called "love". Love is a choice -- not simply, or necessarily, a rational choice, but rather a willingness to be present to others without pretence or guile. Love is a conversion to humanity -- a willingness to participate with others in the healing of a broken world and broken lives. Love is the choice to experience life as a member of the human family, a partner in the dance of life, rather than as an alien in the world or as a deity above the world, aloof and apart from human flesh."

We can start with a gloriously general principle like "God is Love". We can then move from the general to the particular: God loves us. We can ponder how, in a particular situation, we can respond to God's love. And when we respond in love and by being where that love is needed, we sense that God's love is present in our lives. We sense that our lives are bridges in the world between sin and salvation, between suffering and healing, between the general and the particular. As Kahlil Gibran put it, rather than seeing God in our hearts we see ourselves in the heart of God, at the centre of this awesome creative process at work in the world.

Personal commitment to a life shaped and guided by religious sensibilities is NOT a duty. It occurs as we reflect and respond to what we believe is valuable in and for our lives. Organising our personal resources to reflect what is valuable to us is an expression of commitment, not some imposed duty.

I now turn to a central practical implication of living out this view -- or not, as the case may be.

I believe that we desperately need a culture shift in our churches. In spite of possible political misunderstandings, we would do well to refer to ourselves as liberal religious communities rather than free religious communities. We say that revelation is not sealed but we often act as if our purses were. Forget the financial problems of the GA for a moment and look at where most of our congregations are - our congregations and our buildings that we say we love so much. How many of our ministers serve congregations where the live income funds a proper stipend for the minister? Simplifying somewhat, a congregation of 100 requires an average annual contribution of 1% gross income from each member to provide the minister with an income equal to the average of the congregation; a congregation of 40 needs an average contribution of 2.5%, and a congregation of 20 needs 5%. And this is just for the minister's stipend, not the cost of the whole ministry of the church.

If we see ministry as hiring someone to do ministry for us because we have some spiritual duty towards the world, this will be very different from seeing the called minister (or lay pastor or lay leader) as joining our religious community tohelp us to do our ministering. One reflection of this difference will be in our valuing of our support of our ministry.

For most of my adult life I have given a percentage of my gross income to charity in planned, regular giving -- the larger part of this going to various Unitarian causes. When I had small children and related responsibilities this percentage dropped to 1%, but is currently back above 5%. The value that each of you places on your local congregation and the situational stretching or squeezing that affects the actual amount you contribute is for each individual to judge, but I firmly believe that our congregations will never thrive until we support our own ministry. In words mostly of one syllable, one reason we are such poor givers is that too many of us see the ministry of our church as the job of someone we call a minister rather than as OUR, personal, ministry.

Fear of losing our congregations is strong, but the force of a positive commitment to share what we consider valuable is even stronger. Universalists proclaimed an end to fear as a primary motivation. We respond to God's love rather than God's wrath.

I close by illustrating what I mean by sharing the Parable of the Compassionate Jug by Idries Shah, a Sufi mystic who writes for "westerners".

In a hot, dusty, and dark hovel lies a man in agony, made worse by his inability to reach water to quench his thirst. A jug on a shelf on the other side of the room sees his plight and, moved by intense compassion, manages to shift itself to within arm's reach of the suffering man. In his thrashing about, the man discovers the jug and raises it to his lips, only to find that it is empty of water. In his frustration and anger he throws it against the wall and it breaks into pieces.

The progress of humanity depends on the productive functioning of value-oriented communities. As Erich Fromm stated in The Art of Loving, "Love is productive"! Our liberal religious approach has a unique gift to share, and we should be able and willing to share it, but to do this effectively, we each have to search our hearts for the lure, the sense of importance and direction that represents our patterning of our lives in response to a God of Love. This patterning includes action and resource priorities. If our churches do not adequately minister, they will be swept aside by some developing form of community valuing (perhaps even by theatre musicals as mentioned earlier in these Meetings) - and will deserve to be swept aside as shards of empty jugs. The answer is not to shift responsibility for our ministry even further onto a dedicated few. The answer is not to expect some other level of organisation to do our ministry for us. The answer is not to crouch in fear of being swept away, rather to commit our individual selves to shared ministry and commit our resources in line with our truly-felt value of our congregations, which we claim to love. Think on it: We are aware of being part of a dynamic creative force whose beauty and complexity stretch from the majesty of the cosmos to the quantum workings of particles we can only see at third hand. And in our fear and partial understandings we pull back from the very commitment that would make us effective ministers to our suffering world and its inhabitants.

In a few moments we will thank ministers and a lay pastor who are retiring and welcome those starting their ministry with us. Our retiring ministers and lay pastor have together given us 139 years of service, in most cases decades of their lives, leading the ministry of our churches. These men and women have given themselves to help us exercise our ministry for our fellow men and women; for the care of our social values of justice and community; for the care of our congregations that nurture and promote those values; and for the love of our world and its protection from exploitation, pollution, and destruction. We have indeed been blessed by their commitment.

We have new ministers, lay pastors and lay leaders coming through training. Three of them are being welcomed tonight. May we be blessed in future years by their commitment and may they find collaborative and supportive communities in our churches.

Amen.

04 March 2010

Service at Aberdeen Unitarian Church on 24 January 2010

The Selkirk Grace by Robert Burns was jointly recited at the beginning of the Service and the main Reading was several verses of The Kirk of Scotland's Garland. The closing hymn was A Man's a Man for a' That.

Sermon: “The Immortal Memory of Robert Burns”

Well, there is a bit of role reversal here with someone born in the States, although with long and deep immersion in Scotland to the point of taking out citizenship decades ago, appearing before you to talk of your National Poet. But I'll do my best and rely on the fact that Burns is famous around the world and in many languages.

The UUA, an organisation which brings together roughly 1000 congregations, mostly in the States but with some in Canada, has a website of biographies of Unitarians and Universalists and there is an article on Robert Burns which lists his many connections to our liberal faith while acknowledging that he never joined a Unitarian or Universalist Church even though there were a few around during his life. Interestingly, the article was written by Revs Andrew Hill and Peter Hughes, two British Unitarian ministers.

Born in 1759, Burns’s birthday, 25 January, was used as the start and the end of the government's Homecoming Year to promote Scottish identity and tourism and economy. He had a relatively short life, dying aged 37, in 1796 of heart failure. His heart had been weakened by rheumatic fever when he was young. By 1800, four years after his death, his first biography was published in four volumes, by Scottish Unitarian, James Christie! It is believed by some scholars that his poem/ song "Scots wha hae" , 1793, alludes to the show trial and deportation of Dundee's Unitarian minister, Thomas Fyshe Palmer. Palmer had assisted in drafting a petition to the King and for this was deported to Australia. While he apparently flourished in the penal colony, he died on the way home and never saw Scotland again.

Last November and December, STV’s search for the Greatest Scot ever included both Stevensons, Logie Baird who invented television, Charles Rennie Mcintosh, Sir Walter Scott, Sean Connory, The Big Yin, and dozens of others. past and present who help to shape Scottish life and identity. Burns won, hands down as the Greatest Scot ever. Over the years his portrait has adorned various Scottish banknotes and I noticed last week a Bank of Scotland £5 note with Sir Walter on one side and Robert on the other.

Robert Burns: song collector, writer, poet, womaniser, scourge of hypocrisy in the Kirk, a failed farmer and an exciseman. His situation in 1786 was so desperate -- his marriage to Jean Armour had been annulled by her father, his farm was not producing because of (in part) poor soil, and he had been publicly disciplined by the Church of Scotland Presbytery that he resolved to go to the West Indies to make a new life. But he needed money for passage, so he published a book of poems. This received instant acclaim and on the back of that acclaim instead of moving to the West Indies he moved to Edinburgh and became part of “the scene” in the capital of Scotland.

I suppose at virtually all times and all religions to some degree there are tensions within the Community between those who want to keep things as they are and pass them on to the next generation intact without change as evidence of fidelity, as evidence of loyalty, as evidence of one’s spiritual discipline and religiosity, one the one hand. And on the other hand, there are those in the Community who say that whatever we have learned from the past we need to apply with creativity and sensitivity and perhaps even with love to apply to our current situation. It is not enough to take the heritage and pass it along as if we had no existence at all in the process. In Burns’s day in the Church of Scotland, the Kirk, these groups were called the Auld Licht and the New Licht. The Auld Licht were followers of John Knox, who himself had tried to follow the teachings of Jean Calvin in both theology and governance. The perennial tension between those who want to follow tradition fully as literally as possible and those who want to adapt tradition to current circumstances produced a few ministers, especially in Ayr, of the New Licht. Burns talks about some of these with favour in his poems. And then there are, in any tradition, those for whom tradition isn't a focus .... like Ralph Waldo Emerson, or even like Burns himself.

Burns's 'unconventional life-style' was at least partly based on a philosophy which rejected original sin and saw sex as a natural part of love. His father, (whether he was a Unitarian or not is debatable but I think the internal evidence is overwhelming that he was a classical Universalist) taught his children about the love of God as both a reality and a motivation for behaviour rather than fear of punishment. But even more for Rabbie Burns, it was his natural rejection of the hypocrisy of his critics that produced some very fine poetry. In the Kirk of Scotland’s Garland [our first Reading] he makes theological points about the Trinity and about the unfair treatment of New Licht ministers. Holy Willie, an elder in the Mauchline kirk , is mentioned as one of the hypocritical Auld Licht persecutors. He actually was the subject of a separate poem, Holy Willie’s Prayer:

“O Thou that in the heavens does dwell!
Wha, as it pleases best thysel,
Sends ane to heaven and ten to h-ll,
A’ for thy glory!
And no for ony gude or ill
They’ve done before thee.—

I bless and praise thy matchless might,
When thousands thou has left in night,
That I am here before thy sight,
For gifts and grace,
A burning and a shining light
To a’ this place.

What was I, or my generation,
That I should get such exaltation?
I, wha deserv’d most just damnation,
For broken laws
Sax thousand years ere my creation,
Thro’ Adam’s cause!

…..

Yet I am here, a chosen sample,
To shew thy grace is great and ample:
I’m here, a pillar o’ thy temple
Strong as a rock,
A guide, a ruler and example
To a’ thy flock.---”

Burns then continues with a list of Willie’s “indiscretions” and his attacks on others and finishes with:

“But L—d, remember me and mine
Wi’ mercies temporal and divine!
That I for grace and gear may shine,
Excell’d by nane!
And a’ the glory shall be thine!
Amen! Amen!

Burns believed that it was the way we led our lives rather than some Divine Election that made the difference. He believed that the church had become like a hangman's whip to keep the wretched in order through fear -- hardly a picture of love that any of us would recognise. The New Licht followers were trying to open the Kirk to new understandings, the Auld Licht fought back not just by appealing to tradition and Calvinist theology, but by falsely attacking the character of reformers. Burns used his considerable talents to expose this hypocrisy.

Some of his sarcastic wit is unfortunately not suitable for pulpit reading -- if you don't have a Burns' compendium at home, go to a library or website to sample it: it's very rewarding and refreshing.

Many of his poems have been translated into other languages and spread around the world for artistic and even philosophical reasons. I can remember a time, before the fall of the Iron Curtain, reading about a huge shipment of haggis being airlifted to Moscow for Burns’s Suppers there, where he is considered a Man of the People and his poems available in Russian.

However, consider also the spread of Scots around the world who took Burns with them: At the time of Union, the population of Scotland was around 2 million, that of England was around 4 million. So England had twice the population of Scotland. 200 years later and England has eight to nine times the population of Scotland, which in the meantime has grown to about 5 million. Are Scottish men or Scottish women not so fertile? Did they take very seriously the Calvinist condemnation of carnal knowledge? No, Scotland lived those years by exporting its greatest treasure, its people. The reason was poverty. The poverty of Scotland meant we did not have the work to support the babies we produced. So we gave them what for the time was probably the best education in Europe and sent them abroad, as engineers, as architects, as accountants, as politicians, and we now have a situation where our population is about 10% that of England and every country where English is spoken (and many where English is not native) contain communities who trace their roots back to Caledonia, often, it must be said, with an unrealistic idealised picture of life here.

Burns not only wrote poems and lyrics, he collected folk material and saved many oral works from extinction -- indeed he set standards in this area that were important to later collectors of oral tradition. Interestingly, two classical musicians who collected folk music from their traditions, Eduard Grieg and Bela Bartok, also had strong Unitarian connections.

Every year about this time, not just in Scotland but all over the world, Annual Burns’ Suppers take place: There’s the address to the Haggis, the Immortal Memory, the toast to the lasses and the response. There’s the set menu of haggis (vegetarian option now often available), neeps, and tatties. There’s the closing Auld Lang Syne. Barbara & I are going to one in East Kilbride tomorrow where I will give the Selkirk Grace and play a selection of Burns’s songs on my bagpipe. This Aberdeen congregation will be having a Burns’ Supper later this week. While these occasions include recitation of his poems and sometimes singing of his songs, it is the Immortal Memory is the annual reminder of his current influence and relevance. The Immortal Memory is the creative renewal of understanding that makes our appreciation of our Greatest Scot more than routine repetition of the past. It brings the issues and values of our day into our appreciation of his gifts.

I don't want to portray Burns as some kind of saint -- he had some major faults, especially his inability to keep his breeks on in the presence of women, but his fight against hypocrisy in religion stands like a shining beacon through the ages. Those of us who believe that religion can be a force of good and comfort and wholeness for both individuals and the community need to keep this message ever before us: whatever the rationality of our message, whatever the noble aims pursued in the public arena for human betterment, whatever glory and street-cred we get from mixing with folk in high places, if our members and our leaders are found to be hypocrits, not just these people but the whole endeavour will be seen as a sham and it will deservedly revolt those who most need what we are trying to provide. For me the contemporary importance of Robert Burns, aside from his impact on Scottish identity, is this fight against hypocrisy.

Unitarianism tries to be a religion where we say what we believe and if we don’t believe it we don’t say it, hence our rejection of creeds. But Unitarianism is also a religion that believes in a God, however defined, of Love. Our motivation for ethical action is patterning our lives on a God of love rather than a fear of judgment and punishment. Robert Burns’s life, tragically short even in the context of his time 200 years ago, illustrates both these aspects of our religion.

John Clifford

No comments: